CORPORATE PERFORMANCE
Retreat of the RecessionHaving
swung back and forth into recession for three years, corporate India has reasons to be
sanguine. But a roaring recovery is still far off.
By Rohit
Saran and Robin Abreu
Finally, the beginning of the end is in
sight. The 36-month-old slowdown in Indian industry, which often threatened to turn into
an outright recession (when production falls continually for six months), is apparently on
its way out. Not one or two, but a spate of positive economic developments in the past
fortnight suggest so.
First came the rebound in exports which were plagued with a
negative or anaemic growth since 1996-97. In March 1999, Indian exports grew by over 10
per cent -- the fastest in 17 months. Following that was an upturn in manufacturing. The
official yardstick of manufacturing output -- the index of manufacturing production --
rose by 6.6 per cent in February 1999, the highest level since February 1998. Though the
growth slipped again to 2.8 per cent in March 1999, the spurt in tax collections in April
1999 over April 1998 (36 per cent jump in excise and 128 per cent in corporate tax)
suggests an upturn in manufacturing in April.
That's not all. Foreign institutional
investors (FIIs) also turned bullish on India in April and made a net (net of sales)
investment of $225 million (Rs 956 crore) in Indian stocks -- the highest since October
1997. In the first 10 days of this month FIIs poured in $137 million more, propelling the
BSE Sensex to 3,900. This was the highest the Sensex has reached since April 1998 when
nuclear testing at Pokhran had sent the stock markets crashing.
But the most awaited sign of a recovery became evident in the
corporate results for 1998-99 -- especially in the quarterly dissection of results which
Indian companies have to now announce. Though still incomplete (less than 50 per cent of
all listed companies had announced results till May 10), the results available so far
suggest a distinct improvement in corporate bottom lines towards the end of 1998-99 (see
table). The profit growth, which was a modest 7.1 per cent during 1998-99 over 1997-98,
was actually powered by a 12.3 per cent spurt in profits in the last quarter of the year
(January-March 1999 over January-March 1998).
True, the indicators of revival are still sporadic and mild
but they have ignited hope across the corporate world. Says Girija Pandey, director, ANZ
Grindlays Bank: "All around, things are looking up." Seconds Omkar Goswami,
senior consultant with the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII): "The economic
fallout of Pokhran -- II and the bad budget of June 1997 has worn out. That, along with a
resurgent rural demand, should drive industry out of the slowdown."
In fact every single of the dozen industrialists and
economists surveyed by India Today in the second week of May say that industry is coming
out of the woods. This only corroborates the findings of two separate business-confidence
surveys released last fortnight, which heralded the return of the "feel good"
factor among businessmen. What's especially heartening is that the optimism is spreading
despite the political uncertainty. Declares Sunil Bhandare, adviser, Tata Services:
"Negativism is out, irrespective of the political instability, because business has
realised that the worst is over and it's no more waiting for government initiatives."
However, what the experts do differ on is the strength of the impending revival. Will the
recovery blaze brightly but briefly? Or will it be a tide that will lift all the boats
stuck on shore?
Two fundamental factors will decide this. The extent of
additional demand for consumer goods that two continuous bumper harvests (kharif and rabi)
will generate and the magnitude of demand for housing and construction that the sops
offered in this year's budget will create. Comments Subir Gokarn, chief economist at the
National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER): "Initially the recovery will
be led by consumer demand for products and services. It will strengthen only if demand for
investment (cement, steel, machinery, etc) follows up subsequently."
An early pointer to the latter is available in the annual
results of two crucial sectors -- cement and steel. Against the distressing performance in
the entire 1998-99 when the sales of cement companies plunged by 0.4 and profits by 51 per
cent, the last quarter of the year (January-March 1999) showed a modest recovery with
sales and profit growth recovering to 11 and 18 per cent. Thanks to the latent rise in
cement demand, market leader ACC clocked a growth of 9 per cent in sales and 32 per cent
in profits in its annual results. Says S. Ganguly, vice-chairman, ACC: "The demand of
the middle class for housing will boost cement sales further and pull the industry out of
the recession." To a lesser extent, the steel industry is following the sales pattern
of the cement industry.
The 37 per cent jump in the application for housing loans
with Housing Development and Finance Corporation (HDFC) between March and April this year
holds out hope that the pick up in demand for these industries will continue for at least
a few more months. And along with new houses will come the demand for a host of products
and services. Points out D.H. Pai Panandikar, directorgeneral, RPG Foundation: "New
houses will create demand for all those products that a home needs and thus act as a
strong sales booster."
The fortunes of the consumer goods industries (the largest
classification of industries ranging from cosmetics to food products to infotech and
automobiles) have been fluctuating wildly for a few years -- and continued to do so in
1998-99. Not surprisingly, the fps trio -- FMCG, pharmaceuticals and software -- did
exceptionally well in 1998-99 with profits soaring by 29, 17 and 103 per cent and sales
climbing by 16, 20 and 53 per cent during the year. However, falling prices, brought on by
the battle for market share, were the undoing of two major consumer industries -- consumer
electronics and automobiles. The latter also battled with flattening sales. Barring
two-wheelers, the entire automobile sector witnessed falling sales and profits throughout
1998-99. The consumer durable companies that have declared results so far have recorded a
net loss despite a rise in sales. However a few firms like BPL have clocked better
performance through efficient cost management and product and marketing innovations.
That's the most instructive lesson emerging from this year's
corporate results. The spurt in the last quarter profits evident so far is not driven by
higher sales. Rather it is the result of one or the sum of the following -- better cost
management, higher "other incomes" (sale of assets, etc) and lower interest
burdens. Analyses R. Ravi Mohan, managing director of credit rating agency CRISIL:
"In general, the companies have trimmed flab, become focused and are concentrating
more of their core competence. That has enabled cost reduction." While cost cutting
will continue to be helpful, the question is how long can companies sustain a positive
earning trend without a substantive rise in demand?
Industry's big bet for pick up in demand (and hence in sales)
are the preceding two bumper crops and prospects of another good agriculture season. That
is expected to turn rural consumers into big spenders sooner rather than later. Already
the FMCG companies are riding the rural demand boom. The industry bellwether Hindustan
Lever Limited (HLL) achieved a profit growth of 24 per cent between January and March 1999
over the same months of 1998. That when the profit growth in calendar 1998 was already a
robust 44 per cent. Points out K.B. Dadiseth, chairman, HLL: "We will continue to do
well largely because of resurgent rural demand."
The urban demand will be trickier. While public-sector
employees will continue to spend modestly ("Why Aren't You Spending", May 3), a
big kick off in the demand from private-sector employees and professionals will depend on
growth in salaries, which in turn will hinge on corporate performance.
All this, however, does not mean that industry will smoothly
chug along into a sturdy recovery in a few months from now. The roadblocks ahead are big
enough to take the steam out of the recovery, even if they do not derail it. The looming
political instability is one such speedbreaker. To be sure, most of the corporate world
has learned to live with it and some experts view the forthcoming Lok Sabha polls -- with
a price tag of around Rs 10,000 crore -- as an opportunity for demand creation. Quips Pai
Panandikar: "Each Lok Sabha candidate will hire a few workers for campaigning, which
will generate income and demand." Moreover, the economic policy stance of most
political alliances in the fray are known and tested, which reduces the suspense regarding
the future of economic policy. Say Gokarn: "Everybody (in politics) is now a known
devil. That takes the sting out of political uncertainty."
Yet the fall of the BJP-led Government has caused a policy
vacuum that will dog the economy till a new government assumes office. Explains Goswami:
"The next few months will be time to consolidate the gains of a likely upturn in
industry. But that cannot be done by the lame-duck government at the Centre. While India
won't have fresh growth-enabling policies in the next five months, the neighbouring east
Asian economies will restructure themselves menacingly." Apart from the policy
paralysis, the prolonged wait for a new government will put a clamp on the already low
government investment. And that will perpetuate the infrastructure bottlenecks, especially
if the revival sets in substantially.
There is another built-in flaw in this recovery. It is, what
economist call, a cyclical not a structural revival. In simple words, it means that the
upturn is solely propelled by consumer demand which follows a natural cycle of rise and
fall. For the revival to be strong and lasting, it has to be supplemented by structural
improvements both within the industry and in economic policies. Economist Jairam Ramesh,
who recently addressed a CII session packed with CEOs and economists on the causes of the
slowdown, says, "Without structural changes the revival which is widely expected,
will be shortlived."
The two conditions required to strengthen the recovery is
greater consolidation of industries through mergers and acquisitions by companies and a
substantial fillip in private and public investment. But neither is attainable in the
short run. The verdict is clear: While the recession is surely retreating, keep your
fingers crossed for a rip-roaring revival. |