FIFTH COLUMN
VIP OutlawsManu Sharma is the child
of pernicious feudal politics.
By Tavleen
Singh
The most unfortunate aspect of the media frenzy that followed
the horrific murder of Jessica Lall was that it concentrated mainly on Bina Ramani. Had
the target been the alleged killer, Manu Sharma, we may have inadvertently benefited from
what was the most prurient kind of voyeuristic journalism we have seen in a long time. We
now know all about what our society columnists perceive as "socialite" Delhi.
But we know almost nothing about the VIP culture that breeds the kind of vile creature
Manu Sharma must be if he can walk into a bar and kill an innocent woman for the heck of
it.
Manu Sharma is by no means unique or even unusual. Thousands
like him have been bred in the homes of our politicians, bureaucrats and officials in
towns and villages across India. All products of a political culture built on the
fundamental principle that there is one set of rules for our rulers and another set for
us. The gossip columnists who reported the murder of Jessica Lall spewed out reams on Bina
Ramani's VIP connections. Apparently they didn't notice that while she was an outsider,
Manu was very much a product of the system -- one of its many loathsome sons.
The same breed who wander about our villages raping women and
usually getting away with it. The same who routinely kill innocent people if they lose
their temper. Remember the incident in Raipur University in 1998 in which a 19-year-old
girl was killed because she objected to the manner in which the son of a local bigwig was
driving? This VIP son knocked the girl's lunch box out of her hand and drove over it. When
she protested he reversed his car into her, killing her in the process. As in the case of
Manu Sharma, there were a few moments of national outrage and then the story disappeared.
There is every likelihood that the killer is now out on bail and will end up getting away
with a short sentence.
This is not, though, a piece about our hopelessly lax
judicial system but about the evils of a VIP culture that permits a certain group of
Indians to believe that they live in another country. Not just the law, everything is
different for them. The difference begins with security. So we have a group of supercops
who wear grey safari suits or black fatigues and whose sole task is to protect VIPs and
their progeny.
The Special Protection Group (SPG), set up after Indira
Gandhi's assassination, was originally meant to provide security to the serving prime
minister and his family. It was amended, mainly on account of Sonia Gandhi and her
children, to also provide security to former prime ministers and their families. At the
rate we change prime ministers these days, you can imagine how much the SPG's work has
increased.
Who would want to kill H.D. Deve Gowda, Inder Gujral or V.P.
Singh? Yet the Government insists that SPG protection is necessary even for Singh, who has
been in London for several months now. The SPG men who are ostensibly protecting him from
terrorists in London are not allowed to take their weapons into the United Kingdom but
they continue to change shifts every couple of weeks. Their very expensive travel and
hotel accommodation is borne by taxpayers.
When I last wrote about this in my column, Singh was most
upset I had not mentioned the fact that he tried to get his security removed. So I am
mentioning now that he did indeed try. But for some reason successive governments have
refused to withdraw it. This does not, though, take away from the fact that not only are
we paying for Singh's VIP security but also for his VIP healthcare. This column has argued
before -- and will continue to argue -- that VIP healthcare should be abolished.
If our hospitals are not good enough for those who built
them, why should they be considered good enough for us? We all know they are not good
enough, that healthcare in India is almost a myth. But how can these things improve if our
politicians and senior bureaucrats travel abroad for their own health problems? Singh's
healthcare has already cost taxpayers some $3 million (around Rs 13 crore). Can we afford
it? For that matter, can we any longer afford VIP culture?
It does not stop at security and healthcare. We also have VIP
housing. In most democratic countries, it is only the prime minister and the president
whose accommodation taxpayers pay for. But in our uniquely Indian system of feudal
socialism everyone who gets elected, whether to Parliament or to a state assembly, demands
government housing as if it were his birthright.
The result is that in our metropolitan cities and state
capitals the best real estate is reserved almost entirely for our elected representatives.
This is considered such an important perk that Delhi is awash with former ministers and
former MPs who spend their whole time trying to get some minor government job in order to
be able to continue living in the style to which they have got accustomed.
With Lok Sabhas being dissolved on an annual basis, we have
the additional problem of ministers spending small fortunes on redecorating houses that
they often do not end up living in. All of this comes out of money that could be spent on
providing housing, drinking water, hospitals and sanitation to "the masses" in
whose name our elected representatives claim to rule.
Not surprisingly, children brought up within the confines of
VIP India grow up like feudal-socialist princes. There is nothing they want that they
can't have. Is it any wonder then that when someone says "No" to them they
believe, as Indian princes once did, that they have the right to kill? |