





|
RELIGIOUS CONVERSIONS
Politics by Other MeansThe Gujarat
violence against Christians may have started the conversion debate but it is the champions
of reconversion who have the upper hand.
By Uday
Mahurkar and Sheela Raval
For the harried Atal Bihari Vajpayee visiting the troubled
Dangs district in Gujarat, it was probably a way of wriggling out of a difficult and ugly
situation. Buffeted simultaneously by international condemnation, opposition outrage,
minority fears and saffron bellicosity, the prime minister did the equivalent of referring
the troubles in Gujarat to a committee. He pondered for a while, paused and then announced
the need for a "national debate" on religious conversions.
This burst of profundity didn't impress his detractors-the
Congress dismissed it as a "clumsy attempt to divert attention from the ...
atrocities against Christians"-but it certainly enthused those who detected an
"international conspiracy" behind the troubles. A surprised Vishwa Hindu
Parishad (VHP), which otherwise has no love lost for Vajpayee, not only saw it as a
vindication of its stand but also claimed the conversion of Hindus "through force or
inducements" had increased since Sonia Gandhi became Congress president.
This preposterous suggestion was a
crude way of reviving the issue of Sonia's foreign origin, but it served the VHP's
purpose. One by one the great believers in the "Christian conspiracy" thesis
came crawling out of the woodwork. From BJP Rajya Sabha member Dilip Singh Judeo, who
claimed that 4.5 lakh Hindus were being converted to Christianity each year, to veteran
Sarvodaya workers Chunibhai Vaidya and Ghelubhai Nayak of Dangs there was a clamour to
bring proselytisation to the national agenda. Said Vaidya: "The Government should
immediately enact an anti-conversion law. When even Gandhiji and Vinoba Bhave were against
conversions, where is the hitch?" In the Peth region of Maharashtra's Nashik district
where a church was demolished on October 16 last year, Hindu leaders issued an ultimatum
to Christian missionaries to quit the area by March 31. Said Awari Guruji, the
octogenarian freedom fighter and convener of the Dharma Raksha Samity, "It is high
time Hindus take up the conversion issue on a larger scale."
A national campaign against a minority that constitutes
just 2.34 per cent of the population may not hold any attraction for the majority of
Hindus, not even those who are attracted by the BJP's Hindutva plank. If census figures
are any indication, the theory of mass conversion of Hindus is a complete myth. Christians
are no doubt in a majority in the three tiny states of Nagaland, Mizoram and Meghalaya and
have a substantial presence in Kerala but weighed against the Hindus they are minuscule.
In the storm centre of Gujarat, the community constitutes less than 1 per cent of the
population. Nor is there any conclusive evidence to support the whisper campaign that
India is being overwhelmed with foreign funds aimed at buying over Hindus to Christianity.
The Home Ministry does not have any information to substantiate the wild claims of the
Hindu extremist groups that Rs 4,500 crore is being diverted to Christian groups each
year. Even VHP leaders concede that an anti-Christian campaign will have limited appeal
and may ultimately rebound. "The Gujarat incidents have marred our image,"
admits a senior VHP functionary of the state. Worse, VHP President Ashok Singhal's
reported outburst against Nobel Prize winner Amartya Sen has been viewed as the ranting of
a loony.
If the anti-Christian campaign carries the prospect
of diminishing returns, why has the VHP taken it up in earnest? At one level, the reasons
are linked to a perceived threat from Sonia. By raising anti-Christian feelings, the Hindu
fringe seems intent on drawing the Congress president out and forcing her to take a
so-called "anti-Hindu" stand. So far, Sonia has refused to bite the bait. She
has taken extreme care to detach her faith from her politics. Neither has she projected
herself as an ultra-secularist in the western sense. Last week, she used a platform
provided by the Ramakrishna Mission to hit out at intolerant Hinduism.
If Sonia is not biting, why is the VHP persisting? The
answer is curious and can be located in ground realities in the tribal belt stretching
from Bihar's Chhota Nagpur plateau in the east to Gujarat in the west, an area that is
witnessing a ferocious bout of competitive evangelism involving Christian and Hindu
missionaries-a battle for the hearts and minds of tribal Adivasis.
| CASE STUDY: YESHWANT JADHAV |
Incurable
Faith

For this 35-year-old resident of Umarpada village in Dangs
district conversion was a medical imperative. Seven years ago, recalls Yeshwant, he and
his brother suffered from a mysterious "mental ailment" which seemed incurable.
They spent Rs 6,000 at the local hospital and on the tribal witchdoctor, who prevailed
upon them to sacrifice two goats and a chicken. The cure eluded them. Then they heard of a
pastor at a chapel in the nearby village of Vakaria. He apparently cured patients by
offering prayers to "Isu" (Jesus). As Yeshwant remembers, "When we went to
him, he offered prayers for us and also asked us to do so in the prarthna mandir (chapel).
He made us do this for two or three weeks and soon we were cured." Next the
faith-healer demanded his fee. "He asked us," Yeshwant says, "to accept Isu
as our saviour. We couldn't have said no." |
Twenty years ago, it was almost a one-sided affair.
Missionaries carrying the Bible in one hand and a blackboard in the other set up missions
in remote, inhospitable regions even before Independence. Working with dedication, they
established a network of schools, hospitals and churches. Conversions followed, sometimes
in a trickle and sometimes of entire villages.
Of course, it wasn't entirely a smooth transition. The
Constituent Assembly debated the propriety of unregulated conversions and there were
charges of missionaries enticing tribals through allurements. In 1954, the Madhya Pradesh
government set up a committee under Justice B.S. Niyogi to study Christian missionary
activity. The Niyogi report was harsh in its indictment of missionaries. It accused them
of promoting separatism and even creating a "state within a state". By 1968,
Orissa, Madhya Pradesh and Arunachal Pradesh enacted legislations to regulate conversions.
In 1979, Janata Party MP O.P. Tyagi tried to extend the legislation nationwide. Although
this failed, it was around this time that the RSS decided to work systematically among the
tribals and fight the Christian missionaries. By the mid-'80s, conversion was sought to be
countered by aggressive reconversion or "homecoming" of the tribals.
For the new breed of Hindu missionaries like 48-year-old
Swami Ashimanand, a Bengali with a masters degree in physics who came to Dangs after being
forced out of Nagaland, the fight against conversion is a battle to uphold indigenous
culture. Strongly opposed to the Sangh Parivar's vegetarian proclivities, he travels from
village to village distributing the Hanuman Chalisa. Likewise, the 6-ft Dilip Singh Judeo
of the Jashpur royal family combines politics with reconversion of tribals in Madhya
Pradesh. His Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram claims to have brought some 1.5 lakh tribals back to
the Hindu fold. Judeo personally supervises the reconversions by washing the feet of the
converts. In Ranchi, the Dharma Prasar Samity's 55-year-old chief Govind Oraon plays Pahan
(tribal priest) to reconvert Adivasis before idols of Shiva and Parvati. An RSS member,
Oraon echoes Veer Savarkar's view of missionaries: "They are not only changing the
religion but converting nationality." To prevent this from happening, the Hindu
missions have even begun emulating the welfare activities of the church. In south Bihar
for example, the RSS has sponsored 5,000 Vanavasi Kalyan Kendras, 1,100 single-teacher
schools and 500 health centres. All because of the perceived Christian threat.
For these Hindu proselytisers, the conversions debate has
come as a god-send. In Dangs, where the Home Ministry says the Christian tribal population
shot up by 416 per cent since 1981 to approximately 30,000, anti-Christian frenzy has led
to Hindu Bhils becoming more strident. In the first fortnight of January, there were some
1,200 reconversions. Govind Maheria, 35, of Nirgulmal village was among those who went
through shudhikaran (purification) at the hot springs in the Unai temple. "We have
returned to our original home having strayed for a while," he said. It's a
rediscovery that cuts no ice with Father Ashok Vaghela, principal of the Jivan Jyoti
Catholic School in Pimpri village. "This is a dastardly attempt to browbeat
Christians into leaving their faith by the threat of social boycott."
CASE STUDY: JALDUBHAI
JADHAV |
Born-again
Hindu

In August 1998 Jaldubhai, 29, reconverted to Hinduism. He
says he did this of his own accord even though he had spent six years as a Church of North
India (CNI) pastor. According to Jaldubhai, he was sitting at home (Umarpada village,
Dangs district) after finishing school when a CNI pastor visited him: "Being poor I
was looking for a steady income. The pastor. I agreed and was sent to Ahmednagar
(Maharashtra) for training at the CNI centre. We were taught to target poor and ailing
tribals and work on their psychology. We were to tell them that soon the entire world
would turn Christian and they would be left out. We were also asked to eradicate evils
like liquor." Why did he reconvert? "My family cut me off. My father even
stopped eating with me. The social tension also got me to rethink. Plus the insulting
language the preachers used to describe Hanumanji and tribal gods." |
That the violence has intimidated the Christian
community is undeniable. However, if there are desertions from the faith it is also on
account of the fragility of the initial conversions. In Dangs, it is the Catholic Church
that has nurtured welfare programmes, including three boarding schools, three dispensaries
and some income-generation schemes. Yet, ironically, it is the Protestant Friend
Missionary Prayer Band (FMPB) and Indian Evangelical Mission that have drawn the greatest
number of converts. Faith healing has played an important role in drawing tribal Bhils to
these congregations. In a village close to Dharampur town, FMPB pastor Kalubhai Bacharbhai
points to a group of Christian tribals, "Jesus cured them of their ailments and they
embraced Christianity. Seeing this chamatkar (miracle), others are also getting
drawn." Adds Maniben Kokana, a 32-year-old illiterate tribal, "After I started
attending Sunday prayer, I got cured of a severe ailment in my hand." In Peth,
Chintamani Boshare's neighbour was ill and medicine was provided by Father Jabraj of the
FMPB. After the neighbour recovered, Boshare converted and later attended the Yavatmal
Bible School.
"The poor tribal", says a Dutch priest who worked
for 30 years in tribal areas, "doesn't accept Christianity purely out of love for the
God. The motives are mixed. It can be the hope of a better life, a job or even food
security." Yet, "forced conversions" are a rarity. In Madhya Pradesh,
convictions under the state Freedom of Religion Act are few. Between 1980-'82 there were
17 complaints and one conviction. In 1996, a tribal nun was convicted for not informing
the authorities of the conversion of 19 families in Surguja district in 1988.
Normally, conversions prompted by sheer faith shouldn't
have created tensions in a society where spiritual gurus abound. But if there are visible
strains between Christian and Hindu tribals, it is mainly on account of the breakdown of
community spirit.
In his 1998 Papal Encyclical, Pope John Paul II pointed to
the "rich religious and philosophical traditions" of the East. "In India,
particularly, it is the duty of the Christians now to draw from this rich heritage the
elements compatible with their faith ..." The Catholic Church has been particularly
sensitive to non-Christian traditions, some congregations even going to the extent of
having the Om sign outside churches and organising Catholic ashrams.
The problem has been with some of the aggressive
evangelical orders. In a bid to maintain distinctiveness, they encouraged a gulf between
Christians and others. The Peth troubles began after 16 Christian families refused to
contribute to the annual Mawli Puja. In Dangs, as Father Vaghela admits, "The refusal
of Christians to contribute to the tribal festivals was a cause of the communal
troubles." To these were added the insensitive texts in some FMPB manuals. Says Dangs
DSP Manoj Sashidharan: "We have on record a series of complaints about desecration of
Hindu and tribal idols, particularly of Hanuman, by Christians under the influence of
their preachers."
Two wrongs, however, don't make a right. The destruction of
churches has sullied India's image internationally and undermined the claims of Hindus to
be tolerant and accommodating. The VHP, which has a large following in the Indian
diaspora, knows this only too well. So too does the RSS which actually initiated a
dialogue with the church last year and then ended up baiting Christians. Merely because it
sensed an opportunity to score political points. Far from being saved from encroachments,
Hindus may first have to confront the evil within.
-- with Sanjay Kumar Jha, Harinder
Baweja and N.K. Singh |