TASK FORCE RESULTS
Just a Wish ListIndustry captains
make sweeping suggestions for long-term reform. An eager government wants to get cracking
but is still trying to figure out how.
By Shefali
Rekhi
When Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee nominated 12
industrialists to a special advisory council on trade and industry in October, there was
much talk about it. It was for the first time in five decades that the Government was
letting the private sector have a direct say in policymaking, hitherto the prerogative of
bureaucrats. Through this forum, six task force committees with names like Ratan Tata and
Mukesh Ambani as heads were set up and asked to make suggestions within six weeks to
revive the economy.
The committees promptly submitted their reports and the Government believes that
the collaborative effort has paid off. "Now there is clear consensus on reform
ideas," says N.K. Singh, member-secretary of the council. In a hurry to push ahead
with reforms, the prime minister even set up an empowered committee of ministers to act
upon the task force committees' suggestions. The panel is headed by External Affairs
Minister Jaswant Singh and has Finance Minister Yashwant Sinha and Industry Minister
Sikander Bakht as members, all faces of liberalisation within the BJP.
All very well. But as policy watchers point out, the
reports themselves are deficient, in the sense that they make sweeping recommendations
without really detailing how to go about them. Numbering over 200, they are hardly
concerned with immediate economic recovery. The long-term measures are tilted in favour of
the corporates. One of the sub-committees on knowledge-based industries covers much the
same ground as the information-technology task force. The empowered committee too, it is
feared, will not make a difference as it will be under the same constraints that the
Government has been till now. Equally important, it is to be seen if the well-entrenched
bureaucracy will allow these steps to become a reality since it would entail curtailment
of its own powers. A look at some of the areas covered by the reports and what they hold
for the high-power committee:
CAPITAL MARKETS
The recommendations concentrate on long-term reform
measures such as setting up of depositories for fixed income securities, encouraging
foreign institutional investors to improve the debt market and giving a stronger thrust to
disinvestment, even at marked down prices to boost the equity market. "What good can
these measures do when investors are simply not willing to invest?" questions L.C.
Gupta, director, Society for Capital Markets, Research and Development. "These
recommendations are from a corporate point of view and do not address the real
issue."
Which is to restore the confidence of investors. According
to a recent all-India research study by the Society for Capital Markets, investors are
reluctant to put their money on the private sector. Only 15 per cent thought it would be
safe to invest in private-sector bonds, while 80 per cent preferred bonds by the
development financial institutions. More significantly, only 5 per cent said they would
actually invest in a private-sector issue in the next one year.
Given such findings, the task force would have done well to
detail ways of how investor confidence could get a boost, what action should be taken
against defaulting promoters and how to tackle the ballooning problem of companies getting
their shares delisted from the various stock exchanges. Solutions such as these would get
the investor back into the retail market, instill greater confidence in the Government and
put the economy back on the growth curve.
AGRO INDUSTRIES
"Transform India into the world's largest food factory
in the next five years," says the report but doesn't explain how that can be done. It
does advise the Government to increase plan spending during the Ninth Plan from 5.1 per
cent to 7.1 per cent, institute another task force to immediately implement 75 per cent of
the existing 300 incomplete irrigation projects in two-three years and do away with
artificial controls such as storage limits on wheat and rice. But experts reason that
these may not be enough.
Output and productivity in agriculture have suffered from
rigid import and export controls which have prevented farmers from getting a better price
for their products; local restrictions on trade and transportation have aided price
distortions; reserving the agro-processing sector essentially for the small-scale sector
has bred inefficiency. The task force does not make clear a suitable import and export
policy for agricultural commodities nor does it suggest a strategy to liberalise the
domestic market.
There is no talk about the need to abolish the Essential
Commodities Act, under which many of the controls are imposed though it has become
redundant. "You can't keep wishing away globalisation, it is just round the
corner," says agricultural economist Ashok Gulati. "In fact, we will be
renegotiating our terms on agriculture by December '99 under the World Trade Organisation.
However, the task force does not seem to deliberate on it in detail. I'd be more happy to
see an operational strategy document."
Even where it has made some worthwhile recommendations, the
report fights shy of getting into the nitty-gritty. Repealing the Urban Land Ceiling Act
for instance. The real problem here is of leasing. Under the existing law, farmers to whom
land is leased get to have a total say on it in two-three years depending on the laws
existing in the state they are in. This has led to several benami land holdings,
discouraging insurance and lending operations. But this is an area untouched by the
report.
Another recommendation pertains to fertiliser subsidies,
saying they must be reoriented to correct distortions in the use of nutrients. For this
the Government must make a beginning by reimposing its budget decision of hiking the
selling prices of urea by Re 1 a kg, a decision which had been rolled back under political
pressure. It remains to be seen if the empowered committee will reimpose the price hike
given that the political considerations are the same.
INFRASTRUCTURE
Undoubtedly the most critical issue holding back growth, it
still cries for greater attention. The report has some fresh ideas like a new spectrum
policy in telecom to enable the allocation of frequencies to the private sector and the
setting up of special purpose vehicles (SPVs). The SPVs which will get clearances in place
from the Central and state governments before bids are invited for projects will help save
on time and cost delays. But for these, the report on infrastructure is a reiteration of
reform moves currently on. Rakesh Mohan, director-general, National Council of Applied
Economic Research, however, is not so dismissive. "In a sector like infrastructure
where the private sector has to be involved in a major way, their endorsement itself is
significant," he feels. "The report makes clear what is the best practice to be
followed and now it is for the Government to go beyond."
But to implement some of these measures, the Government
does need to put in a lot of groundwork. For instance, the task force recommends a shift
from the licence fee-based approach for telecom projects to a service tax-based one. In
other words, it wants a shift to the revenue-sharing system. But it doesn't explain how
this can be brought about. A change post-tendering will also mean litigation which hasn't
been addressed. The task force is of the view that the licence fee paid should be treated
as an advance against future dues. This would be difficult for the Government since it is
possible that the money has already been consumed.
Similarly in the case of power, there are many questions
left unanswered. While the task force recommends restructuring of state electricity
boards, it doesn't dwell on the issue of raising user charges from rural and domestic
consumers. There is also a recommendation that theft of power ought to be curtailed but it
is left to the Government to figure out how this should be done.
With the reports offering few workable solutions, the task
before the empowered committee is not easy to say the least. It will first have to figure
out ways in which the various recommendations can be implemented before getting down to
action. One only hopes that this does not entail the formation of another set of
committees. |