FIFTH COLUMN
Fire TamashaCompulsive agitators should make electricity their cause.
Tavleen Singh
Organised labour and organised thugs have voices so loud in
our country that they invariably manage to get heard over everyone else. Barely has one
lot finished yelling and screaming about something than the others start. So the entire
nation has been swept along in the past couple of weeks by organised labour's fury over
the possible privatisation of the insurance sector and by the Shiv Sena's fury over Fire.
The first lot called a nation-wide strike to draw attention to itself. The second forced
cinemas to close because it didn't like a movie.
Our tragedy is that on account of being forced to pay
constant attention to this kind of tamasha we have little time to concentrate on
infinitely more important issues -- like the fact that India could face
"darkness" in the foreseeable future unless we can get consumers to pay for
electricity. The expression is not mine but that of Power Minister Rangarajan
Kumaramangalam: "We will have had it unless we do something. You will have
darkness."
If his grim prediction comes true then India will quite
simply not be entering the 21st century except in a chronological sense. That century, now
barely a year away, is going to see the flowering of the information age; and there can be
no information age without that most important of prerequisites: power. But the power
minister, despite being one of the BJP Government's more intelligent and articulate
products, remains a voice in the wilderness. His attempts to point out that the problem
has to be dealt with urgently usually get ignored. Instead populist, irresponsible chief
ministers try to buy rural votes by providing free power to farmers.
Farmers are not the only ones who pay less than they
should, if they pay at all. You and me do the same. The power minister points out that on
every additional megawatt the state produces it loses Rs 50 lakh a year -- because it
costs Rs 2 per unit to supply power for which we pay Rs 1.40, if we pay at all.
We require an additional 80,000 MW of power by the year
2010 given our present rate of five per cent annual economic growth. This will cost
approximately Rs 3 crore per megawatt. Even if we find the money to pay for this
additional 80,000 MW, India will continue to be among the world's lowest users of power.
Seventy per cent of rural homes remain without electricity. Even people in our cities and
towns complain of chronic power shortage.
Without getting into Power Ministry jargon it is easy to
understand how little power the average Indian consumes when you consider that the average
Chinese consumes twice as much. Even Pakistanis consume more than us.
There are people in our country (dare I mention her name
without being inundated with another torrent of abuse) like Medha Patkar who believe that
using too much power is a bad thing. She and her pals spend their lives preventing power
plants from coming up on the specious grounds that Indians do not need much power and that
on the whole the use of electricity is some kind of "elitist" plot. This is not
just rubbish, as I have pointed out before in this column, it is dangerous rubbish.
What is elitist is the fact that we have followed power
policies which seemed geared entirely towards our cities and towns. In an age in which
information comes from computers and television screens, what our skewed power policies
have done is create a new caste system. In this system the Harijans are those who do not
have access to the single most important thing that makes computers and televisions
possible: power.
This has happened mainly because of policy makers too
believing that power is something only rich businessmen need. As a result, the power
sector has been so neglected that a power plant takes twice as long -- and sometimes
longer -- to be built in India than elsewhere.
In most countries it takes no more than five years to build
a hydel plant. In India it can take three times as long. Not just because of outdated
procedures and bad policies but also because of pressure from lobbies of the Patkar
variety. Thermal power plants face similar problems. The end result is crores and crores
of rupees wasted on delays in a country that can barely afford to pay for power plants.
Among the solutions Kumaramangalam is offering is the
privatisation of power distribution. He believes this should have been done even before we
got into privatised production because this could be the only way to save the vast
quantities of power that are simply stolen on the way to being distributed. To do any of
these things though we need a government that can spend some time working instead of
putting out fires -- fires started more often than not for the silliest reasons.
Does it really matter, for instance, whether Fire deals
with lesbianism? If the Shiv Sena doesn't like lesbians it can quite simply avoid seeing
the film. The chief minister of Maharashtra would do much better to spend some time
examining whether his Government can afford to provide the free power that his master, Bal
Thackeray, so generously offers people at his public meetings. Our politicians need to
wake up to how desperately the average Indian wants regular, efficient power supply.
If Delhi voted overwhelmingly against the BJP in the recent
state elections one reason was memories of a summer when almost the entire city spent
night after night in darkness and day after day sweltering in the heat. In the villages as
well bijli is usually an election issue. But is there anyone who can listen above the din
of our organised voices? |