





|
COVER STORY
Perilously YoursHamstrung by internal pressures and demands from allies, the Vajpayee
Government struggles for cohesion and direction.
By Swapan Dasgupta
It
won't be merely a change of government, the detractors of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)
had screamed from the rooftops, it will be a change of regime. When the change was
ceremoniously effected under soft sunshine in the forecourt of Rashtrapati Bhavan last
Thursday morning, it seemed less a revolution than just another flicker in the history of
Indian democracy. The crackers bursting in the distance, feeble shouts of "Jai Sri
Ram" and an unconcerned cat walking lazily up the imposing red-carpeted stairs of the
erstwhile Viceregal Palace failed to convey the sense of history inherent in the second
swearing-in of India's only prime minister who reached the top without ever associating
with the Indian National Congress. Atal Bihari Vajpayee entered the history books without
disturbing history.
Partywise Representation |
|
Number of MPs |
Number of Ministers |
| BJP |
179 |
25 |
| AIADMK |
18 |
4 |
| Samata |
12 |
2 |
| BJD |
9 |
2 |
| Akali Dal |
8 |
2 |
| Shiv Sena |
6 |
1 |
| PMK |
4 |
1 |
| Lok Shakti |
3 |
1 |
| TRC |
1 |
1 |
| Arunachal
Cong |
2 |
1 |
| Independent |
4 |
3 |
| Total
number of ministers
43 |
Not that there wasn't a hint of change. The security
personnel were slightly disoriented at the new faces of a new hierarchy and failed to
separate the wheat from the chaff. A saffron-robed Uma Bharati was rudely instructed to
take a back seat until she was rescued and led to the separate enclosure for prospective
ministers. Mamata Banerjee was dragged out of unobtrusiveness by Sushma Swaraj and
installed in the front rows, along with a preening J. Jayalalitha and the dapper Farooq
Abdullah. Bangalore's Ananth Kumar looked a shade too young to be a Cabinet minister and
Bihar's Babulal Marandi had to be constantly reminded of his newly acquired ministerial
importance by mentor Sushil Modi. If Mumbai's Ram Naik was disappointed at being made a
mere minister of state and Himachal Pradesh's Shanta Kumar at not being sworn in at all,
they kept their misgivings to themselves. For the moment, as BJP's Gujarat strongman
Narendra Modi -- who sat himself next to Bollywood star and Gurdaspur MP Vinod Khanna --
put it, "Anand hi anand hai."
That may well have been true, but there was no taking away
the underlying tension behind Home Minister L.K. Advani's all-too-familiar hand wringing
and Prime Minister Vajpayee's equally familiar distracted geniality. Even as Vajpayee and
Advani graciously accepted the interminable bouts of congratulations from friends and
flatterers, their thoughts must have been on the one colleague whose absence from the
Cabinet publicly exposed the fragility of the Government and the vulnerability of its top
leadership.
Uncivil Parivar Wars
When prime minister-designate Vajpayee despatched the final list
of his Council of Ministers to President K.R. Narayanan at 8 p.m. last Wednesday, it
included the name of Jaswant Singh. The inclusion of Singh was itself a subject of debate
within the BJP. A former deputy leader of the parliamentary party and the finance minister
in the 13-day government, Singh was a casualty of the anti-incumbency wave that decimated
the BJP in Rajasthan. As such, the proposal to induct him into the Cabinet ran into a
barrage of political and ethical questioning. Should a defeated candidate be inducted into
the ministry in such haste?
In the normal course, ethical considerations -- so important
in a party that still clings to its fading "distinctiveness" -- would have
prevailed. But Singh wasn't any other politician. A trusted confidant of Vajpayee, Singh's
importance lay in the fact that he was the prime minister's only choice as finance
minister. In the fortnight that preceded the formal assumption of responsibility, the BJP
explored three other options. An attempt was made to persuade Advani to try his hand at
finance. Advani firmly declined the offer. "I am not instinctively comfortable with
the subject," he told colleagues. Former party president Murli Manohar Joshi wasn't
similarly inhibited. With definite views on complex subjects like public debt and
membership of the World Trade Organisation, Joshi would have loved an opportunity to
present the next budget. The problem was his image as a swadeshi hardliner. That left
Yashwant Sinha, a former finance minister in Chandra Shekhar's government. Sinha, a former
IAS officer who joined the BJP as late as 1994, had an acceptable public image and was not
known to be dogmatic. His only drawback was whispers in the party about his alleged
closeness to a business house.
For two weeks, Vajpayee and Advani were at the receiving end
of spirited lobbying over the finance portfolio. Finally, after Singh's successful mission
to Chennai on March 15 to persuade Jayalalitha to settle her differences with the BJP,
Vajpayee made up his mind: he was going to induct Singh. Advani concurred and the three
held numerous discussions on the possible direction of the ministry.
But Singh's detractors weren't giving in so easily. Pressure
was mounted against Singh from three quarters. First, a group of corporate lobbyists with
BJP links, who enjoyed free access to the Vajpayee and Advani households, kept up the
anti-Singh tirade. The opposition was masked in ideological terms: Singh was painted as
anti-swadeshi with a pro-multinational tilt. Second, some BJP office-bearers with whom
Singh has an uneasy relationship, were pressed into action to keep a "defeated"
politician out. None of these pressures appeared to have worked and Singh's name was duly
forwarded to Rashtrapati Bhavan on Wednesday evening.
By 9 p.m that day, a certain peace had descended over the
Vajpayee and Advani households. At Pandara Park, Advani and his trusted secretary Deepak
Chopra began a round of telephone calls to all those in the BJP who were to be sworn in as
ministers the next day. And Vajpayee was getting ready for his last quiet family evening
before assuming charge of the top job. It was then that Vajpayee had an unexpected guest:
K. Sudarshan, the unassuming organising secretary of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh
(RSS), often described as the BJP's holding company.
For Vajpayee, Sudarshan's message was devastating: under no
circumstances would the RSS accept a defeated politician in the Cabinet. Vajpayee
contacted Advani, but even the party president was helpless. Sudarshan's message bore the
authority of Sarsanghchalak Rajendra Singh (Rajju Bhaiyya), the last word in the Sangh
Parivar. By early morning, Rashtrapati Bhavan was informed that Singh was not going to be
included in the Cabinet. Vajpayee was understandably distraught, but there was nothing he
could do. He tried to negotiate for Singh's early entry to the Rajya Sabha and a stop-gap
arrangement. "I will hold charge of finance," he announced before television
cameras. Within four hours, he had to eat crow. His advisers told him that the work load
would be intolerable and that the financial community would interpret it as a sign of
indifference. Grudgingly, Sinha was appointed finance minister.
That corporate lobbying, couched in RSS sanctimoniousness,
was ultimately responsible for Singh's ignominious jettisoning is revealing. Hanging on to
office by a wafer-thin "working majority" that can be overturned by even a few
MPs, the Vajpayee Government is most susceptible to pressure. With key ministries,
particularly those connected to infrastructure, controlled by allies, some of whom have
definite personal agendas, it will be extremely difficult for the Government to take bold
-- sometimes unpopular -- decisions. The National Agenda for Governance, for example, is
remarkable for its complete lack of audacity even on issues like controlling government
spending and disinvestment. The new Government has begun by advocating a line of least
resistance. The problems could assume menacing dimensions if Vajpayee fails to become his
own master.
Too much accommodation
Running a coalition government is difficult at the best of
times, as the United Front (UF) discovered to its cost. Advani believes it will be
different this time since "there is a dominant party -- the BJP -- at the core".
However, if the prolonged, and sometimes fierce, haggling over the spoils of power is
anything to go by, it will not be very different this time too. Jayalalitha, with control
over 27 MPs, may lag far behind the BJP's own 176 MPs, but the numbers game has to be
assessed in strategic terms. Without the AIADMK's co-operation, a Vajpayee Government is a
non-starter. Likewise, without the support of Independents and other minor parties, the
Government could lose its "working majority". No wonder the Trinamool Congress
had to be placated by a yet-unspecified package for West Bengal.
This inherent fragility has ensured that the allies have
extracted a very handsome pound of flesh. In line with the assurances extracted from
Vajpayee personally, the AIADMK and its nominees have acquired control over sensitive
ministries such as law and company affairs, petroleum and surface transport, not to
mention revenue and banking. The portfolios are of great consequence in view of the
outstanding cases against Jayalalitha's friend Sashikala Natarajan filed by the
Enforcement Directorate. The AIADMK supremo, it would seem, named her price for support to
Vajpayee after meticulous calculation. Whatever her motive, the structure of the new
government makes Jayalalitha the most powerful politician after the prime minister,
perhaps more powerful.
Nor does the political extortion end there. The Biju Janata
Dal has gained control over steel, coal and mines. In short, everything that constitutes
the economic lifeline of Orissa. An enviable position for a party that has only nine seats
in the Lok Sabha. Likewise, Buta Singh, an Independent, has been accommodated as minister
of telecommunications, a department that generated considerable notoriety under Sukh Ram
(another new ally of the BJP). The underlying logic is that such strong inducements will
make it virtually impossible for the allies to contemplate shifts in allegiance. When the
optimum demands have been conceded, can a possible Congress-UF combination better the
terms?
To view the accommodation of allies as an amicable
power-sharing arrangement is theoretically possible. In practical terms, it was preceded
by tantrums and brinkmanship. Last Wednesday morning, for example, the Samata Party almost
opted out of the Government when the BJP refused to consider its demand for either the
home or finance portfolios. Subsequently, after bouts of gentle persuasion, the Samata
leadership agreed to let Nitish Kumar assume charge of railways, but keep George Fernandes
out of the ministry. Sensing a possible unguided missile, the BJP offered Fernandes the
defence portfolio. He turned it down on the novel plea that he "would have to dress
up formally too often". The ministry was then offered to the Lok Shakti's Ramakrishna
Hegde, who got himself sworn-in on the assumption that he was the new defence minister. In
between, Fernandes had a change of heart and following his discussions with Vajpayee and
Advani, agreed to shoulder the burdens of the armed forces. It was then left to the BJP
duo to inform Hegde that he had been gazumped. Consequently, the Ministry of Commerce
slipped into the Lok Shakti's hands.
The present bout of ministry-making is not the end of the
story. There are indications that the Trinamool Congress may join the Government after the
vote of confidence and the West Bengal panchayat elections in May. Mamata may feel that
her style will be cramped by joining the Government, but Ajit Panja may well have to be
given a Cabinet berth. As things stand at present, there is a dearth of meaningful
portfolios to go round. Such difficulties aggravate alliance heartburns.
Vajpayee had better manage his allies. He has no more cards
up his sleeve.
Nice guys end up zero
"Our stability", says BJP trouble-shooter Pramod
Mahajan, "will be based on the fact that nobody wants an election". In theory,
Mahajan may be prescient. But the question that haunts an increasingly frazzled Vajpayee
is: Will he be a captive prime minister? Captive to the extortionism of some insatiable
ally? Captive to sectional pressures within his own party?
Certainly, there is no question -- as the Jaswant Singh and
Jayalalitha episodes revealed -- of Vajpayee being a completely free agent. There are
pressures on every government and every administration has to make its own compromises.
Even Rajiv Gandhi with a steam-roller, single-party majority was no different. What is
relevant in a mili jhuli sarkar (coalition government), as Vajpayee likes calling his
arrangement, is to achieve a degree of coherence. The functioning of departments will
depend on its ministers, and Vajpayee is blessed with an uneven team. To make a mark, he
will perforce have to identify a limited set of priorities, leave them in capable hands
and lead from the front using his greatest attribute -- his status as a mass leader -- to
full effect. When Vajpayee wants his way and chooses to be assertive -- as he did during
the controversy over Subramanian Swamy -- he finds the opposition wilting. When he plays
the nice guy -- as he did in the face of RSS opposition to Singh -- he finds others ever
willing to walk all over him, and even embarrass him publicly.
Throughout his political career, the prime minister has been
a fierce individualist, a soloist who has let the team carry him on its shoulders. Such a
style may now work if combined with ruthless assertion. H.D. Deve Gowda made a much more
effective coalition man than I.K. Gujral because he was not afraid to thump the table and
force a decision. Gujral faltered at the altar of elusive consensus. To succeed, Vajpayee
has to mentally transcend his vulnerability. He must not only be the leader, but
demonstrate that he is boss. He has to use his honeymoon period to establish the ground
rules for the future. Otherwise, he could find himself burdened by a Government that is at
odds with itself. The BJP went to the polls promising a stable government with an able
leader. If it fails on either count, the electorate will not take revenge on the aiadmk or
the Janata Party. It will not even remember that Vajpayee was hamstrung by a perverse
mandate. Its ire will be directed at the BJP. For Vajpayee, after a distinguished career
spanning four decades, the choice is unambiguous. He has "a pledge to redeem and a
promise to fulfill".
More |