





|
OBITUARY: E M S
NAMBOODIRIPAD
A Classless LifeBy K Govindan Kutty
 |
(1909-1998) |
A few hours before he died on the afternoon of March
19, E.M.S. Namboodiripad was witness to what he would have conceivably loathed most in his
life: the BJP's ascent to power. It had been branded the main enemy of the CPI(M), of
which he was the general secretary until 1992. And now, the enemy was winning. For the
millionth time in the course of his ceaseless politico-literary outbursts against it, he
berated in what was to be his last book review all that went by the name of Hindutva. Its
eventual victory must have made him sad but not quite surprised in the 89th year of his
life.
Much had already happened that blackened his red dreams. What
was known as the communist fatherland crumbled. Many communist parties chose to be known
by other names after a protracted experiment with revolution. The ideological movement
with which EMS grew up never really grew beyond the borders of two-and-a-half states of
India even after six decades. That was more than enough to shake anyone with a robust
mental build, and inspire acute cynicism all around. Remarkably, that did not happen in
his case. One thing EMS never became was a cynic. His concern for poor people, and his
hope that tomorrow would be theirs, never dimmed a shade. If there was anything dim about
it, it was his dialectical diction that had somewhat lost its verve through overuse.
For six decades and a half, whether in or out of power, EMS
was a frame of social and intellectual reference. Often, it was what he said that set the
tone of political discourse. And nothing he ever said went without provoking a pervasive
reaction, whether hostile or hysterical. This was a quality he possessed right from when
he entered public life, giving up not only his enormous inherited property but also the
mental encumbrance of the supremacy of the caste in which he was born. The man who ended
up debunking Hindutva had in fact begun his life with a study of Hindu scriptures and
Vedas, stretching over several years. Such study had done little to refine the life of the
student. Which was why EMS set out 70 years ago to "make Namboodiris men",
telling them to hell with their obscurantism and forcing them to allow remarriage of
widows. That mutiny against the guardians of tradition in his own Brahmin tribe saw EMS
instantly becoming its leader. And he remained a leader ever since.
A man who stammered as he did could not have become an orator
known for his dazzling eloquence. For its lack, EMS had something else in abundance: wit
and erudition. Asked once what he felt when he stammered, his cryptic answer was that he
stammered only when he spoke. A peaceable man like him was an unlikely communist who would
exhort the toiling masses to join an armed insurrection against the ruling classes. Yet
EMS was among the architects and interpreters of all his party's changing theories of
revolution. He had the best of the bourgeois in him; he was also the best adopted son of
the working class. Naturally, he emerged as his party's choice for chief ministership of
Kerala in 1957 when it created world communist history by winning power through an
election, rather than seizing it through an uprising.
As a winner of power, he was illustrious. To win it he would
employ all useful tactics, the end always justifying the means. When comrades asked how a
communist party could adopt what was derisively called the parliamentary path, he had a
clever answer: that was one good way to expose the inadequacies of bourgeois parliaments.
As for bestowing sanctity on bourgeois institutions, he said it was all a tactical show
before wrecking such institutions from within. He had once taken on the courts saying they
merely dispensed bourgeois justice. Time was when he declared that he would ally with the
devil to defeat the Congress, which then represented the ruling class. And thus, in the
'60s, he started off in Kerala a political fashion of coalition governments which India
was to adopt several years later. His problem was that he could never sustain the
coalitions he put together. He couldn't care less. He was a pioneer, not a preserver.
Eighty-nine years are too long to let anyone remain hidebound
in consistencies. EMS was never a compulsive prisoner of consistencies. As his critics and
comrades both say in a tone of adulation, there is perhaps no political statement of his
that EMS did not contradict later. What did not change ever was his concern for the
wretched of the earth and his commitment to a movement that sought to vest a measure of
dignity in little dark men who used to be driven like cattle in the fields of Kuttanad.
EMS would be remembered for those concerns, only them. |