|
BUILDERS
& BREAKERS
For the People
E.V. Ramaswami Naicker and C.N. Annadurai
By
Cho S. Ramaswamy
|
| Both
electrified Tamil Nadu with dynamism and easy charm.
But what's left of the Dravidian movement is just
a shadow of what either of them dreamt and planned
for. |
|
|
He abused Tamil as the language of barbarians and ridiculed
the Tamil people by claiming that he, a Kannadiga, could
become a leader of the Tamils because there was no Tamilian
fit to lead them.
Looking
back at the life and times of E.V. Ramaswami Naicker,
revered as Periyar (1879-1973), one may safely conclude
that he was accepted and acclaimed as the leader by a
significant section of the Tamil population in spite of
all his contempt for Tamil and disdain for Tamils only
because he was perceived to be a genuine individual, a
rarity among those in public life. There was no shade
of hypocrisy in him and he never attempted sophistry while
propounding his social philosophy. And what a philosophy
it was!
His
message was clear. For the people to advance and prosper,
they must abandon the Hindu religion, the superstitions
that went with it, the idols and ceremonies created by
it, and the caste system born of it. This was the essence
of the social doctrine enunciated by Periyar. His scheme
of action was as simple as the doctrine itself: get rid
of the Brahmin. With him would go all other things associated
with the Hindu religion.
This
unconcealed anger against the Brahmins is said to be the
result of a practice in a gurukulam, a school run by a
Congressman in the 1920s, in which food was served to
the Brahmin boys and others in different sections. If
the objectionable practice hurt the sentiments of EVR,
the cold indifference with which his justifiable complaint
was treated by the Congress shattered his faith in the
party and made him believe that it was a party of Brahmins.
Later EVR left the Congress to form the Self-Respect Movement.
While in the Congress he had actively participated in
the khadi propaganda effort, the agitation for prohibition,
and led the Vaikom Satyagraha for the temple entry of
Harijans. It was a poignant irony that having played a
commendable role as a Congressman in the Independence
movement, he, in 1938, found himself leading the Justice
Party which was somewhat of an asylum for blind supporters
of the British. It was the only party in India to have
supported the infamous Rowlatt Act; not only that, they
had even the depravity to defend the Jallianwala Bagh
massacre.
But
far from blemishing that party's chronicle of dishonour,
Periyar made his own contribution to it. The man who sold
khadi on the streets of Madras Presidency while in the
Congress, was now trying to sell the state to the British.
This craving for British rule persisted with EVR even
after the Justice Party was reborn as the Dravidar Kazhagam
(DK), the mother of all Dravidian parties. His hatred
of the Brahmins consumed him to such an extent that he
even abhorred Independence and pleaded with the British
to retain Madras Presidency under them even if they were
to leave the other parts of India. Fortunately for himself
and his party, his demand was not taken seriously by anyone,
including the British.
Was
EVR a success? No doubt he is hailed even today as one
of the leaders of the Tamil people but what was the fate
of his philosophy, his message? Total and complete disaster
there.
He
broke the idols of Vinayaka; today the Vinayaka procession
is a gala event in Tamil Nadu. He tore pictures of Rama
and applied the chappal to it; a few years ago Tamil Nadu
sent a strong contingent of devotees of Rama carrying
bricks for the shilanyas at Ayodhya. He fought superstitions;
his followers in the aiadmk tonsured their heads for the
good health of their leader, J. Jayalalitha. He cursed
the caste; now the offshoots of his movement, the DMK
led by K. Karunanidhi and the aiadmk, are fighting elections
dependent on caste-based votes, and caste-based parties
have come up in Tamil Nadu. He poured his wrath on the
Brahmin; now the leader of DK is an unabashed trumpeter
Jayalalitha, a Brahmin. He was the apostle of secession;
his followers swear allegiance to national integration.
In
spite of this failure on all fronts, Periyar is still
revered because of the solid contribution he made in the
demystification of the Brahmin from the exalted position
in society. But in his crusade against the caste system,
however, he did not concentrate on the liberation of the
Harijans, perhaps for fear of alienating his followers,
mostly from the other castes. The man who fought for the
Harijans while in the Congress, started passing over their
miserable plight once he was leading his own party. In
this regard, the worth of EVR's work could be judged by
the plight of the Dravidian parties. They are unable even
today to gain the confidence of the Dalits who have formed
their own organisations to fight for their rights. The
judgement then of the political and social history of
Tamil Nadu could only be that while Periyar the singer
was admired, his song was ignored. As a man Periyar was
the embodiment of civility, which is why he is still loved.
The man was greater than his message.
In
fact, his message was so unsaleable a commodity that C.N.
Annadurai (1909-1969) had to abandon many aspects of it
when he quit the DK, to form the DMK in 1949. As with
everything concerning the Dravidian parties, the split
too had a touch of the ludicrous, as it occurred not on
any policy differences or ego clashes, but on the question
of the marriage which EVR contracted at a ripe old age,
probably for ensuring companionship and nursing. CNA and
his men condemned the marriage, quit the DK and formed
the DMK. Maybe, CNA and his colleagues were waiting for
an excuse to break free of the shackles of non-electoral
functioning, which EVR had imposed on his party.
But
CNA had openly aired his differences with EVR even earlier
in 1947, when EVR called upon his followers to observe
Independence Day as a day of mourning. Though CNA as a
member of the DK had not demurred when EVR pleaded for
direct British rule for Madras Presidency, even after
they left the other parts of India, he began to cast away
the more bizarre platforms of EVR once he became a leader
in his own right. Thus for CNA's DMK it was "one God"
in the place of EVR's "no God". It was Brahminism which
had to be rooted out, not the Brahmins as was the programme
of EVR. Tamil for CNA was his first love, while for EVR
it was a pet aversion. More than all this, CNA abandoned
the Dravidanadu demand for sheer political survival in
the context of the Anti-Secession Act. Originally the
slogan of the DMK was "Let us get Dravidanadu or go to
the burial ground". Ultimately it was Dravidanadu which
was sent to the cemetery.
CNA's
DMK won the 1967 elections in alliance with several parties,
including that of Rajaji's Swanthara Party. His success
was the defeat of EVR, for the latter campaigned vigorously
against the DMK, and irony of ironies, for the Congress.
It never recovered in Tamil Nadu from the kiss of death,
and the DMK grew in strength in spite of all the abuse
showered on it by Periyar. CNA, known for his wit and
sarcasm, dedicated the DMK's victory to Periyar, after
deliberately burying his most cherished goals. Though
CNA had given up the demand for Dravidanadu only to escape
the clutches of the Anti-Secession Act, he also exhibited
rare courage in doing it, for it was the foundation on
which his party had been built. But this kind of political
nerve came naturally to him. He was perhaps the only leader
of any party, who allowed a second line of leadership
to emerge in his own lifetime but even went out of the
way to spot such talent and encouraged them to develop
as future leaders. This paid rich dividends to the party,
which produced a notable line of leaders. An orator of
extraordinary brilliance, a writer of considerable merit,
a parliamentarian of remarkable talent, CNA's worth as
an administrator could not be assessed as his tenure as
chief minister was cut short by his untimely death, an
event mourned by the entire state irrespective of party
affiliations. His greatest achievement was that he could
emerge as one of the respected leaders of Tamil Nadu after
having begun his political career as a mere rabble rouser
with a reputation which was at best, debatable. EVR got
his movement isolated by his attitude of obstinate confrontation;
CNA synthesised his party in the mainstream of national
politics by judicious use of the art of compromise. While
the movement of EVR stands debilitated today, the party
of CNA is still a force. What was left after CNA, of the
Dravidianism propounded by EVR got diluted still further
by M.G. Ramachandran, the founder of the AIADMK. He could
be described as an illegitimate child of the Dravidian
movement, as he was the offspring of the cohabitation
between the movement and the movies. The remnants of the
Dravidian philosophy have been entombed by Jayalalitha.
She parades the present leader of Periyar's anti-Brahmin
movement as her principal apologist. Periyar wanted to
change society with his movement; his followers have changed
his movement. The metamorphosis is complete.
Cho
S. Ramaswamy is editor, Tughlak.
THE
MYSORE DUO KRISHNARAJA WODEYAR IV & M. VISVESVARAYA
If
Karnataka boasts of being India's pioneering software
centre today, some of the credit must be apportioned to
Krishnaraja Wodeyar IV, Maharaja of the erstwhile Mysore
state (1884-1940). But computers in the country in the
early 1900s? Not exactly. Wodeyar's contribution lay in
the fact that at a time when most maharajas were content
to stay in the lap of luxury, his bold initiatives gave
the state a headstart with education and industry, among
other areas.
If
Wodeyar had a vision for the state, he also had an able
architect in Sir M. Visvesvaraya (1861-1962) to give shape
to it. Together they turned Mysore into an industrial,
agricultural and human- resource power centre of their
times. A trained engineer, industrialist and statesman,
Viswesvaraya had pioneered state-of-the-art water supply,
drainage and irrigation systems in townships of western
India during the late 1800s. He came to Mysore on a special
request by Wodeyar. Among the foremost planners of India,
Viswesvaraya wrote several books elucidating his ideals.
That one of them, Reconstructing India, is still considered
a reliable guide by policymakers speaks volumes for the
man -- and his maharaja.
|
|