More than 50 years ago. Nandalal Bose on one of those
quiet Santiniketan avenues. Short, dark, withdrawn.
Walks slowly. Speaks softly as if he sucks his words
in. But has a bright glint in his eyes, through which
peeps a watchful mind. Has a crown of curly black hair.
Internally restless. Has with him a stack of blank cards,
an ink slab and brush. To make small sketches in monochrome.
Record things, recall old images, invent the new.
For
Nandalal Bose this was a compulsive exercise. Like writing
a diary or telling a rosary. He spoke little but when
he did he had many amusing anecdotes to recount, many
insightful things to say. They made you think. Leonard
Elmhirst who travelled with him and Rabindranath Tagore
to China said to be in Bose's company was an education
in itself.
Seen
together with the Tagores, Abanindranath and Rabindranath
-- one a remarkable painter and writer and his guru,
the other his lifelong mentor, associate and renowned
poet -- Bose should have seemed nondescript. But those
who knew Bose found him equally unforgettable, including
the Tagores. Abanindranath saw in him his artistic heir.
Rabindranath wanted to get him as an associate in his
Santiniketan experiment so badly that he risked confrontations
with Abanindranath and Lord Ronaldshay. He said that
rarely did one come across in one person such a union
of intelligence, sympathy, skill, experience and insight.
It
was while he was studying art in Calcutta that he met
Abanindranath. Later Rabindranath took him to Santiniketan.
The Tagores left it to Bose to work out a cogent agenda
in the field of art and try them out in practice.
Without
going into the dialectics of modernism or post-modernism,
Bose addressed the same questions in a home-spun way.
His focus was on the awakening of the creative potentials
of each individual. And since they were bound to differ,
you were sure to have different levels and categories
of arts. Some that lay close to the process of fabrication
and function. Some that lay close to the process of
self-expression. Some in between. But in all this no
individual was alone. He operated within an existing
culture or reacted to it. All this was implicit in the
ideas he outlined in his scanty writings and the activities
he encouraged, selling round the notion of an artist-artisan
who could hold himself out at various levels of practice.
In an insidious way, it influenced our present notions
on art. Bose was to a certain extent sidelined in his
own time as a sectarian idol, a prominent leader of
the nationalist backlash against colonial disinformation
and condescension. That he was one is beyond question.
But he was not a defensive polemist. His concern was
to uncover the source streams of India's creative genius
to make its encounter with the the world robust and
fruitful. He built a valid conceptual base for a new
Indian art with the conviction that you have to know
yourself if you have to know the world.
K.G.
Subramanyan is
a painter and teaches Indian art history at Santiniketan.